Tuesday, May 6, 2008

The Lying Professor

From the blog, Overcoming Bias, out of Oxford:

What made Dr. K memorable was a gimmick he employed that began with his introduction at the beginning of his first class:

"Now I know some of you have already heard of me, but for the benefit of those who are unfamiliar, let me explain how I teach. Between today until the class right before finals, it is my intention to work into each of my lectures ... one lie. Your job, as students, among other things, is to try and catch me in the Lie of the Day." And thus began our ten-week course.

This was an insidiously brilliant technique to focus our attention - by offering an open invitation for students to challenge his statements, he transmitted lessons that lasted far beyond the immediate subject matter and taught us to constantly checksum new statements and claims with what we already accept as fact. Early in the quarter, the Lie of the Day was usually obvious - immediately triggering a forest of raised hands to challenge the falsehood. Dr. K would smile, draw a line through that section of the board, and utter his trademark phrase "Very good! In fact, the opposite is true. Moving on ... "

As the quarter progressed, the Lie of the Day became more subtle, and many ended up slipping past a majority of the students unnoticed until a particularly alert person stopped the lecture to flag the disinformation. Every once in a while, a lecture would end with nobody catching the lie which created its own unique classroom experience - in any other college lecture, end of the class hour prompts a swift rush of feet and zipping up of bookbags as students make a beeline for the door; on the days when nobody caught the lie, we all sat in silence, looking at each other as Dr. K, looking quite pleased with himself, said with a sly grin: "Ah ha! Each of you has one falsehood in your lecture notes. Discuss amongst yourselves what it might be, and I will tell you next Monday. That is all." Those lectures forced us to puzzle things out, work out various angles in study groups so we could approach him with our theories the following week. (Read More)


Malcolm Gladwell on The Nature of Genius

From this week's New Yorker:

One of the first comprehensive lists of multiples was put together by William Ogburn and Dorothy Thomas, in 1922, and they found a hundred and forty-eight major scientific discoveries that fit the multiple pattern. Newton and Leibniz both discovered calculus. Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace both discovered evolution. Three mathematicians “invented” decimal fractions. Oxygen was discovered by Joseph Priestley, in Wiltshire, in 1774, and by Carl Wilhelm Scheele, in Uppsala, a year earlier. Color photography was invented at the same time by Charles Cros and by Louis Ducos du Hauron, in France. Logarithms were invented by John Napier and Henry Briggs in Britain, and by Joost Bürgi in Switzerland.

“There were four independent discoveries of sunspots, all in 1611; namely, by Galileo in Italy, Scheiner in Germany, Fabricius in Holland and Harriott in England,” Ogburn and Thomas note, and they continue:

The law of the conservation of energy, so significant in science and philosophy, was formulated four times independently in 1847, by Joule, Thomson, Colding and Helmholz. They had been anticipated by Robert Mayer in 1842. There seem to have been at least six different inventors of the thermometer and no less than nine claimants of the invention of the telescope. Typewriting machines were invented simultaneously in England and in America by several individuals in these countries. The steamboat is claimed as the “exclusive” discovery of Fulton, Jouffroy, Rumsey, Stevens and Symmington. (Read More...)

Or watch this video of his speech at the New Yorker Conference in 2007.

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Big Ideas Event: The Ideas Behind The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

From NYU Alumni Magazine:

In the 2004 film, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Jim Carrey’s character, Joel Barrish, undergoes a medical procedure to erase some aching memories after a break up with his girlfriend. Thought scenario intrigued many – the movie won an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay – most assumed it was merely the stuff of cinematic fantasy. But director Michel Gondry acknowledges that the story was inspired, in part, by neuroscientist Joseph E. LeDoux’s 2000 paper on the prospect of memory erasure for those with post-traumatic stress disorder. And while LeDoux’s real world progress is still far behind the film’s fictional technology, his therapeutic goals are no less ambitious.

From Salon.com:

A much-lauded pioneer in his field, the 58-year-old LeDoux, who is the Henry and Lucy Moses Professor of Science at NYU's Center for Neural Science as well as director of the Center for the Neuroscience of Fear and Anxiety, is perhaps used to being greeted by scientists, students and brain buffs alike with, as the New York Times put it, "enthusiasm usually reserved for rock stars."

The acclaimed neuroscientist, Joseph LeDoux, who currently heads NYU’s new Emotional Brain Institute, will be coming to the Residential College on April 23rd to talk his fascinating research on fear and memory and what it can tell us about the War on Terror. The event is sponsored by the Big Ideas Stream – we’re hoping it will be one of our best events this semester.

Students from other streams are also encouraged to attend. Please come and bring your friends and favorite faculty members.

Food and drinks will be served after the event.

Please let me know if you plan on coming, by emailing me at Eric.Ozawa at NYU.edu.

Wednesday April 23rd.
5:45-7:30 in the Broome Room.

You can find out more about Professor LeDoux here.
Listen to an interview on NPR here:

Nicholson Baker on Wikipedia

From The New York Review of Books:

Wikipedia is just an incredible thing. It's fact-encirclingly huge, and it's idiosyncratic, careful, messy, funny, shocking, and full of simmering controversies—and it's free, and it's fast. In a few seconds you can look up, for instance, "Diogenes of Sinope," or "turnip," or "Crazy Eddie," or "Bagoas," or "quadratic formula," or "Bristol Beaufighter," or "squeegee," or "Sanford B. Dole," and you'll have knowledge you didn't have before. It's like some vast aerial city with people walking briskly to and fro on catwalks, carrying picnic baskets full of nutritious snacks.

More people use Wikipedia than Amazon or eBay—in fact it's up there in the top-ten Alexa rankings with those moneyed funhouses MySpace, Facebook, and YouTube. Why? Because it has 2.2 million articles, and because it's very often the first hit in a Google search, and because it just feels good to find something there—even, or especially, when the article you find is maybe a little clumsily written. Any inelegance, or typo, or relic of vandalism reminds you that this gigantic encyclopedia isn't a commercial product. There are no banners for E*Trade or Classmates.com, no side sprinklings of AdSense.

It was constructed, in less than eight years, by strangers who disagreed about all kinds of things but who were drawn to a shared, not-for-profit purpose. They were drawn because for a work of reference Wikipedia seemed unusually humble. It asked for help, and when it did, it used a particularly affecting word: "stub." At the bottom of a short article about something, it would say, "This article about X is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it." And you'd think: That poor sad stub: I will help. Not right now, because I'm writing a book, but someday, yes, I will try to help.


More here.

Saturday, March 1, 2008

Big Ideas Events: Slavoj Zizek Takes on Hollywood

The Famous/Infamous Slovenian Philosopher/Psychoanalyst Slavoj Zizek takes on Hollywood in this lecture/performance at the New York Public Library.

The tickets were sold out, but Big Ideas has managed to reserve some seats.

Watch a clip from a new film about Zizek in which he comments on The Matrix and Solaris:



Here's another clip - this one funnier and less art directed - that should help to introduce Zizek's style of provocation and Hegelian/Marxist/Lacanian theory. He takes on the question of what exactly happened in Casablanca and what that tells us about the way Hollywood films work.

Time: Wednesday, March 12th 7:00pm

Place: New York Public Library
Celeste Bartos Forum
Humanities and Social Sciences Library
5th Avenue and 42nd Stre
et

RSVP with me at Eric.Ozawa at NYU.

Big Ideas Upcoming Events: A Public Debate at the New York Public Library about the Front Lawn

What is a front lawn for?

On the surface, this sounds like a strange question. For those of us who grew up in the suburbs, the front lawn probably didn't seem to be worthy of much thought, beyond the practical considerations of sprinklers, fertilizer, and the perennial question of whose job it was to mow it. These days, however, we're in the midst of a renaissance in thinking about our own domestic ecology, and one of the major sites of the current debate turns out to be the front lawn.

This Friday, the New York Public Library is hosting a public debate on the uses and misuses of the front lawn in America, inviting a range of internationally renowned figures from the worlds of Art, Architecture and Theater.

Here's the official description:

"What Is Wrong with an Edible Estate?"

In 2005, Los Angeles architect and artist Fritz Haeg planted the first “edible estate” garden in Salina, Kansas—the geographic center of the United States. One front lawn at a time, the Edible Estate project is replacing the domestic front lawn with a highly productive, edible, organic garden landscape. Three more prototype gardens have since been created in California, New Jersey, and England, with two more Edible Estates forthcoming in Texas and Maryland.

The publication of Haeg’s new book, Edible Estates: Attack on the Front Lawn, marks the beginning of a concerted national campaign to dramatically overthrow an American institution, the front lawn. Gardens of food will be promoted to fill these toxic spaces that currently divide our neighborhoods, devour precious resources, and pollute our air and water.

The Edible Estates project is at the nexus of many disciplines and current topics of interest: global/local food production, art as social action, radical gardening, urban agriculture, gardening as a public spectacle, food security, water and energy use, peak oil and the uncertain future of suburbia, the blurring of public and private in the front yard, community and neighbor relations, the phenomenon of the American front lawn, etc. However, this alternative project brings with it a new set of questions.

A public debate with project creator Fritz Haeg; theater director, Peter Sellars; author and Yale professor of architecture, Dolores Hayden; author of A Short History of the American Stomach, Frederick Kaufman; 2008 Whitney Biennial curator, Shamim Momin; and director of LIVE from the NYPL, Paul Holdengräber will engage the audience in an open discussion with the question, “What is wrong with an Edible Estate?”

A projection screen will alternately display the Edible Estates videos and time-lapse images depicting the removal of the front lawn and the planting and growth of the four Edible Estates gardens in Kansas, California, New Jersey, and London.

About Fritz Haeg

Fritz Haeg works between his architecture and design practice, Fritz Haeg Studio; the happenings and gatherings of Sundown Salon; the ecology initiatives of Gardenlab, which include Edible Estates; and his role as an educator. He has variously taught in architecture, design, and fine art programs at CalArts, Art Center College of Design, Parsons, and the University of Southern California. In 2006 Haeg initiated Sundown Schoolhouse, the alternative educational environment based in his geodesic dome in Los Angeles. He has produced projects and exhibited work at the Tate Modern; the Whitney Museum of American Art; Mass MoCA; the Institute of Contemporary Art, Philadelphia; among other institutions. His new on-going series of projects called “Animal Estates” will debut at the Whitney Biennial in 2008 with a commissioned installation in front of the museum. Edible Estates: Attack on the Front Lawn is his first book.

About Peter Sellars

Theater, opera, and festival director Peter Sellars is known for ground-breaking interpretations of classic works. Whether it is Mozart, Handel, Shakespeare, Sophocles, or the 16th-century Chinese playwright Tang Xianzu, Sellars strikes a universal chord with audiences, engaging contemporary social and political issues. He has staged operas at the Chicago Lyric Opera, the Glyndebourne Festival, the Netherlands Opera, the Opéra National de Paris, and the San Francisco Opera, among others. Following his iconic stagings of Le Nozze di Figaro, Don Giovanni, and Cosi fan tutte, Mr. Sellars established a reputation for bringing 20th-century and contemporary operas to the stage and has expanded the repertoire of modern opera. He has collaborated with John Adams on Nixon in China, The Death of Klinghoffer, El Niño, Doctor Atomic, and, most recently, A Flowering Tree. Sellars has led several major arts festivals, including the 1990/1993 Los Angeles Festivals, the 2002 Adelaide Festival in Australia; and the 2003 Venice Biennale International Festival of Theater in Italy and the 2006 festival in Vienna, New Crowned Hope, celebrating the 250th anniversary of Mozart’s birth. Sellars is a professor in the department of World Arts and Cultures at UCLA and a resident curator of the Telluride Film Festival.

About Dolores Hayden

Dolores Hayden is Professor of Architecture, Urbanism, and American Studies at Yale University and has written extensively about the history of American urban landscapes and the politics of design. She is the author of Building Suburbia: Green Fields and Urban Growth, 1820-2000; A Field Guide to Sprawl; Redesigning the American Dream: Gender, Housing, and Family Life; and The Power of Place: Urban Landscapes as Public History. Hayden is also a poet whose work has appeared in literary journals such as The Yale Review, Southwest Review, and The Kenyon Review. Her most recent poetry collection is American Yard.

About Frederick Kaufman

Frederick Kaufman is the author of A Short History of the American Stomach. A professor at the City University of New York's Graduate School of Journalism, he has written about food culture and other subjects for Harper's Magazine, Gastronomica, and The New York Times Sunday Magazine, among others.

About Shamim Momin

Shamim Momin is associate curator at the Whitney Museum of American Art and branch director and curator of the Whitney Museum of American Art at Altria. Momin was a co-curator of the 2004 Whitney Biennial and has curated numerous exhibitions for the Whitney Museum, including Terence Koh, Mark Grotjahn, Raymond Pettibon, and Banks Violette: Untitled. Exhibitions at Altria have included projects with artists such as Andrea Zittel, Rob Fischer, Sue de Beer, Mark Bradford, and Ellen Harvey. Momin has contributed essays to numerous other monograph collections, art periodicals, and exhibition catalogues, most recently as an author for the Phaidon Ice Cream series. She is co-curator of the 2008 Whitney Biennial.


Location:
Celeste Bartos Forum
Humanities and Social Sciences Library
5th Avenue and 42nd Street (directions)

Date:
Friday, March 7th
7:00 pm
Meeting time on Campus to be arranged.

We have a limited number of tickets.
RSVP with me by sending an email to Eric.Ozawa at NYU

Friday, February 29, 2008

Big Ideas in Music: Musical Language

Here are two pieces on musical language, inspired by a blog post in which music critic Carl Wilson (author of a new book on why he hates Celine Dion when so many people love her and what that tells us about the way musical taste operates) argues that there's a connection between the unofficial Obama campaign ad, "Yes We Can" being played on YouTube and the compositions of Steve Reich.

The first piece looks at the work of Steve Reich and how recording a simple phrase - "It's gonna rain" - led to his invention of musical phasing.





The second piece comes from the fascinating radio show Radiolab.



Listen to the rest of the show here , download the episode, or subscribe to their podcast on itunes.

Big Ideas in Music: David Byrne and Thom Yorke discuss the Music Business



Everyone knows now about Radiohead's recent coup in the music business. They dropped their label and released their newest album, In Rainbows, via their own website for anyone to download. The price you pay is up to you.

Wired explains:
It turns out the gambit was a savvy business move. In the first month, about a million fans downloaded In Rainbows. Roughly 40 percent of them paid for it, according to comScore, at an average of $6 each, netting the band nearly $3 million. Plus, since it owns the master recording (a first for the band), Radiohead was also able to license the album for a record label to distribute the old-fashioned way — on CD. In the US, it goes on sale January 1 through TBD Records/ATO Records Group.

While pay-what-you-will worked for Radiohead, though, it's hard to imagine the model paying off for Miley Cyrus — aka chart-topping teenybopper Hannah Montana. Cyrus' label, Walt Disney Records, will stick to selling CDs in Wal-Mart, thank you very much. But the truth is that Radiohead didn't intend In Rainbows to start a revolution. The experiment simply proves there is plenty of room for innovation in the music business — this is just one of many new paths. Wired asked David Byrne — a legendary innovator himself and the man who wrote the Talking Heads song "Radio Head" from which the group takes its name — to talk with Yorke about the In Rainbows distribution strategy and what others can learn from the experience.
In the interview, Byrne and Thom Yorke discuss how the music industry is changing and what those changes might me for aspiring musicians and fans.

From David Byrne's companion article,"Survival Strategies for Emerging Artists - and Megastars":

What is music?

First, a definition of terms. What is it we're talking about here? What exactly is being bought and sold? In the past, music was something you heard and experienced — it was as much a social event as a purely musical one. Before recording technology existed, you could not separate music from its social context. Epic songs and ballads, troubadours, courtly entertainments, church music, shamanic chants, pub sing-alongs, ceremonial music, military music, dance music — it was pretty much all tied to specific social functions. It was communal and often utilitarian. You couldn't take it home, copy it, sell it as a commodity (except as sheet music, but that's not music), or even hear it again. Music was an experience, intimately married to your life. You could pay to hear music, but after you did, it was over, gone — a memory.

Technology changed all that in the 20th century. Music — or its recorded artifact, at least — became a product, a thing that could be bought, sold, traded, and replayed endlessly in any context. This upended the economics of music, but our human instincts remained intact. I spend plenty of time with buds in my ears listening to recorded music, but I still get out to stand in a crowd with an audience. I sing to myself, and, yes, I play an instrument (not always well).

Continue the thread on David Byrne's remarkable website here and here.

Listen to the New York Philharmonic's Historic Concert in Pyongyang

Via WNYC:

Monday, February 18, 2008

Big Ideas in International Relations: The UN General Assembly.

Flag of the United Nations
In this weekend's NY Times Book Review, Francis Fukuyama, the famous theorist of "The End of History" and a one-time "compagnon de route" of the Neo-conservatives, reviews a book by Samantha Power, who among other things is now a senior foreign policy adviser to Barack Obama,. Power's new book is a biography of Sergio Viera de Mello, who was the UN's special envoy to Iraq until he was killed by a suicide bomber in the summer of 2003.

For Fukuyama, his book review is a chance to offer his own judgment of the UN:

On Aug. 19, 2003, a Kamash truck pulled into the alley behind the Canal Hotel in Baghdad and a bomb detonated, crumpling a corner of the United Nations’ mission in Iraq. Inside the building was Sergio Vieira de Mello, a Brazilian-born United Nations official who had previously served in Vietnam, Lebanon, Cyprus, Cambodia, Bosnia, Rwanda, Kosovo and East Timor. More than anyone else at the United Nations, he embodied the organization’s idealism, as well as its limitations. Vieira de Mello was pinned under the rubble and hung on for several hours before dying. The ineffectual efforts of American forces to save him were a harbinger of the larger American failure in Iraq.

Samantha Power, whose earlier book, “‘A Problem From Hell’: America and the Age of Genocide,” won a Pulitzer Prize, has written a comprehensive biography of Vieira de Mello that explains how his personal evolution paralleled that of the United Nations and how his contradictions and failures were rooted in those of the institution he so loyally served. Vieira de Mello was born in 1948. The son of a Brazilian diplomat, he was a prototypical global cosmopolitan who grew up in Europe and, as a student, manned the barricades during the événements of 1968 in Paris while studying Marxist philosophy. The young Vieira de Mello was instinctively anti-American and cringed when he heard an American accent. After earning his degree, he found work with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, traveling to southern Sudan, Mozambique and Vietnam, and passionately embracing the United Nations and international law as the embodiments of global justice.

But the organization’s approach was fraught with internal contradictions that were rudely exposed in the genocidal crises of the mid-1990s. Before the end of the cold war, its peacekeeping operations involved interspersing lightly armed international troops to separate combatants who had signed peace deals and providing humanitarian assistance. The United Nations racked up some successes in places like Namibia, El Salvador and Mozambique, where security conditions were not terribly demanding.

After 1991, however, the number of peacekeeping initiatives exploded, painfully revealing the United Nations’ limitations. Its ethic of strict political neutrality between warring parties ended up favoring aggressors like the Serbs in Bosnia and Kosovo. Moreover, the peacekeepers’ restrictive rules of engagement prohibited them from firing their weapons, even in self-defense. This led to disgraceful episodes like the one in Rwanda in 1994 when Belgian peacekeepers abandoned the Tutsis to rampaging Hutu militias.

[Read More]

Samantha Power will be appearing at NYU's Center for Global Affairs on March 10 at 6:30. [More Info]

Big Ideas Upcoming Events: Reserve a Ticket for George Packer's acclaimd new play on Iraq after the fall of Saddam

This month I'll be taking a group of students to see George Packer's critically
acclaimed new play on Iraq at the Culture Project, just a few blocks away from Broome Street.

Date: Wednesday, Feb 27th at 8pm

From the official website:

Betrayed, based on Mr. Packer's interviews in Baghdad,
tells the story of three young Iraqis - two men and one woman -
motivated to risk everything by America's promise of freedom.

Betrayed explores the complex relationships among the Iraqis
themselves, and with their American supervisor, struggling to
find purpose while a country collapses around them.
More Here:

You can read Isherwood's review in the Times here.

RSVP with me at Eric.Ozawa at nyu.edu

Big Ideas in Politics: An Update on Superdelegates in the Democratic Primaries

I wanted to follow up here on something I posted last month about the potential role of superdelegates in the nomination process for the Democratic party. Back then, superdelegates were barely in the news, now they seem to be everywhere. Will superdelegates end up picking the nominee? Are they undemocratic? Are they fair?
From the New York Times:

Former Vice President Al Gore and a number of other senior Democrats plan to remain neutral for now in the presidential race in part to keep open the option to broker a peaceful resolution to what they fear could be a bitterly divided convention, party officials and aides said Friday.

Democratic Party officials said that in the past week Mr. Gore and other leading Democrats had held private talks as worry mounted that the close race between Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton could be decided by a group of 795 party insiders known as superdelegates.

The signs that party elders are weighing whether and how to intervene reflects the extraordinary nature of the contest now and the concern among some Democrats that they not risk an internal battle that could harm the party in the general election.

But they also provided an early glimpse at the complex set of tradeoffs facing party leaders, from their desire to make their own influence felt to their worries about offending the candidates and particular constituencies — not to mention the long, sometimes troubled relationship between Mr. Gore and the Clintons.


[Read More]

Big Ideas in Politics: The Bradley Effect and Race in the Election

Does the so-called Bradley Effect still exist? If so, how is it effecting the Presidential election? What does it reveal about race in American society? What does it reveal about the psychology of polling and voting?

Here's some background on the theory from the PBS program Newshour:

These results suggest that the "Bradley effect" -- a term used to describe the fact that pre-election polls often overestimate support for black candidates -- may still play a role in elections, according to a new analysis by University of Washington researchers Anthony Greenwald and Bethany Albertson. But, the researchers say, the Bradley effect is complicated, and there may be evidence for a "reverse Bradley effect" in which pre-election polls underestimate support for black candidates in states with large black populations, such as in Alabama and Georgia.

The Bradley effect is named for former Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley, who narrowly lost the 1982 race for California governor to his white Republican opponent, George Deukmejian. Polls had suggested he had a comfortable lead, and researchers theorized afterwards that while many white voters told pollsters that they would vote for Bradley, they behaved differently once they entered the voting booth.

[More here]

The article also contains an interview with a social psychologist and a political scientist who are analyzing the polling inaccuracies in the recent primaries for evidence of the Bradley effect or the "Anti-Bradley effect."

Last week, they compared pre-election polls to actual results in the 13 states for which they could find multiple late pre-election polls, analyzing data in 11 Super Tuesday states plus New Hampshire and South Carolina. They found that in states where less than 10 percent of the population is black, including California, Arizona, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, polls over-predicted the Obama vote by as much as 12 percent. But in states where more than 25 percent of the population is black --Alabama, South Carolina and Georgia -- polls under-predicted Obama's lead by 15 percent or more.

Those numbers are intriguing, but they raise many more questions than they answer, the researchers and others say.

Friday, February 15, 2008

Big Ideas in Politics: Your Generation - More on Turnout

From Rock the Vote: [Register to Vote via their website]
According to CNN’s exit polls and the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), in nearly every state holding their primary or caucus last night, youth voter turnout increased significantly- doubling, tripling and even quadrupling turnout from 2000 & 2004!

Here are some highlights:
* In Tennessee young voters quadrupled their turnout, up from 35,000 in 2000 to nearly 140,000 young people between the ages of 18-29 casting a vote in last night’s primary.

*In Georgia young voters tripled their turnout with more than 280,000 individuals casting a ballot last night compared to approximately 92,000 ballots cast in 2000.

* In California, more than 850,000 voters under 30 cast ballots, far surpassing 2000 and 2004 levels.

Youth turnout was the winning margin of victory in several states.

*On the Democratic side, Barack Obama won the state of Missouri by just 10,000 votes, propelled to victory by 75,000 young people casting ballots in his favor. And on the Republican side, 45,000 young people voted for Mike Huckabee, far surpassing his 23,000 vote margin of victory. [Read More]

[Register to Vote via their website]

A bit of history (or a pop-culture diversion disguised as history) prompted by this paragraph from the Time Magazine cover story on your generation's role in this election:
If you want to feel old, just tell a group of teenagers today that you can remember a time when the Clintons were hip. There was this guy on TV, see, called Arsenio Hall, and Bill Clinton went on wearing sunglasses and playing a saxophone, and, well, no, it wasn't on YouTube — this was before most people had heard of the Internet — oh, never mind. There's nothing new, for today's young people, about a Clinton replacing a Bush.
Well, I looked, and it turns out that that clip isn't on YouTube. It is, however, available on Arsenio Hall's personal website (though in a mediated VH1 Behind the Music format).
Here's a flashback from the 1992 Presidential Campaign: Bill Clinton woos young voters by playing the saxophone on The Arsenion Hall Show.


Bill Clinton on the Arsenio Hall Show

Big Ideas in Politics: Your Generation


PHOTOGRAPH FOR TIME BY ROBYN TWOMEY



There has been a lot of press recently about the role young voters are playing in this election. The Politico reports:
By recent historical standards, youth turnout is having a banner year. In every primary or caucus so far the youth turnout percentage has been the same or — almost always — greater than it was four or eight years ago.

Older voters are coming out in greater numbers, too, thanks to the competitive races in both parties. But young people are increasing their turnout more, and as a result their share of the electorate has risen in every state. [Read More]

Now that's true of all of the Super Tuesday states EXCEPT for New York. What happened here? What was your experience on Super Tuesday? Did you vote?

Check out Time Magazine's cover story on the influence of young voters on this campaign or watch this video from the Wall Street Journal on the role of young voters might play in the upcoming Texas Primary.

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Big Ideas in Politics: Clintonism

Now that Bill Clinton is back in the headlines again (and some are making allusions to the Bull Moose Party) it's worth looking again at Matt Bai's fine analysis of the competing versions of Clinton's legacy:
There are, among Democrats, dueling interpretations of what Clintonism means and how it came into being. The most popular version now, by far, is that Clintonism was chiefly an electoral strategy, a way of making Democrats sound more acceptable to conservative voters by softening the party’s stances on “values” issues like guns, welfare and abortion and introducing pallid, focus-grouped phrases like “work hard and play by the rules” and making abortion “safe, legal and rare.” In other words, Clinton was basically as liberal at heart as any other Democrat who marched for civil rights and protested the Vietnam War, but he was a brilliant political strategist who instinctively understood the need to rebrand the party.

Even some of Clinton’s friends from the old days — those lukewarm defenders of the faith — accept this basic version of history. “Clintonism was about winning,” says Susan Estrich, the longtime Democratic strategist and pundit. “It was about grabbing victory from the jaws of defeat. If you were a Democrat of a certain age, it was like being a Red Sox fan — you never won. And even when you won, you lost, because you got Jimmy Carter. Clinton led us out of the desert when no one else could.”

On the other hand, Clinton’s more ardent supporters, those few who were there at the beginning, argue that Democrats have badly miscast him as an expedient strategist, when in fact he was a visionary and a modernizer. “He used to tell me all the time, ‘One of these days, people are going to figure out that I actually believe in this stuff,’ ” Al From told me recently. From and the Democratic Leadership Council that he founded in the 1980s have in recent years become a kind of convenient stand-in for Clinton, the main object of acid derision from liberal bloggers who prefer to savage someone other than the former president himself for the evils of Clintonism. Clinton was the chairman of the D.L.C. when he ran for president, and much of his campaign rhetoric came from its work.

There's much more than this. It's the best article I've read in a while about Clinton's presidency and what it will mean for the current election. Read it here.

Big Ideas in Politics: Superdelegates

This semester, we'll be paying special attention to the big ideas at play in the ongoing presidential campaign. The coverage of this campaign has been intensive without managing to be exhaustive. One of the benefits of the intensity of the coverage and the unprecedented length of this campaign has been the light it has shed on the small but sometimes pivotal fine print rules of the American electoral process.

Today's New York Times has an article explaining one of those rules that might end up playing a key role in deciding who ends up getting the Democratic party's nomination: the rule that covers superdelegates:
Not all Democratic presidential convention delegates are awarded like door prizes in the primaries and caucuses being so fiercely contested around the country.

National party rules give special status to a select political group, including members of Congress, governors, members of the Democratic National Committee, past party officials, and former elected leaders like Presidents Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter and their vice presidents, Al GoreWalter F. Mondale. and

Officially designated unpledged party leader and elected official delegates, members of this high-powered group are usually known by a catchier term: superdelegates.

If the primary season does not settle the nomination fight and it turns into a hunt for individual delegates, it is conceivable that this group of politicians and party insiders could hold the balance in awarding the nomination.

READ MORE

Big Ideas in Politics: Defining the Middle Class

Though December may seem like ancient history in this media coverage of this campaign, I'd like to draw your attention to a post by the campaign reporter Matt Bai on the New York Times Politics blog. It seems that nearly all the candidates these days are talking about helping the struggling middle class, but precise meaning of the term remains hazy. Bai writes:

All the Democratic candidates, to one extent or another, have been blurring the distinction between the poor and the “middle class” — arguing, in effect, that rising inequality means there is increasingly little distinction between the two. It’s important to define these terms, because they have a lot to do with how you make policy. We know what we mean by poverty, more or less; the federal government defines that by income ($20,650 for a family of four at the moment), and about 14 percent of Americans qualify. But you might be surprised to learn — I certainly was — that there is no recognized definition of what it means to be middle class.

Read More

Read a profile of Matt Bai written by an NYU student.

Welcome Back to Class

Welcome Back -
Brittany and I have some interesting events planned for this semester, but we're always looking for your suggestions. Some of my favorite events from last semester came from student suggestions - the amazing "Tings Dey Happen," the King Corn screening, the lecture by the leader of Human Rights Watch. All of those events were made possible by Broome Street students like you. So keep the suggestions coming. If you have any professors whom you'd like to invite to give a special guest lecture to our group, please let me know.

Now that the semester's back in session, I'm going to try to catch up on posting here about all of the big ideas in the news this past month.

I'm looking forward to seeing you soon.

Eric

Sunday, January 13, 2008

Welcome Back!

Hey guys! To ring in the new semester, here are some upcoming events:

Thursday, Jan 24th at 9pm
Discussion of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s "Racism and the White Backlash"
Ever wonder if the words of MLK still ring true? Find out at this program. Feel free to pick up the reading for this discussion in the envelope outside of Room 901.

Saturday, Feb 2nd at 11am
Current Events in Room 901.
Coffee, Doughnuts, and Race Relations.

Monday, Feb 11th at 9pm
Screening of Invisible Children: Rough Cut
Please come support the grass roots campaign to raise awareness of the Internally Displaced People in Northern Uganda.

I am looking for peer leaders for these programs if you are interested. Email me at blp233@nyu.edu

--Brittany